Layer8 Tech Group Franchise Evaluation Suite — About This Portfolio

About This Portfolio

8 franchise opportunities. 6 categories. Every FDD pattern you’ll encounter.

This demo portfolio spans 8 franchise opportunities across 6 categories — from insurance to industrial services to fitness — using real public FDD data where available and realistic market-range estimates where not. The portfolio is designed to show the full range of outcomes the Layer8 Franchise Evaluation Suite produces: exceptional disclosure and economics at one end, missing Item 19 and contracting systems at the other.

STRONG BUY — Score 8.0+

Brightway Insurance
8.44 / 10 STRONG STRONG BUY

A home-based insurance franchise with one of the strongest Item 19 disclosures in any category — 25% profit margin on $687K average revenue. The revenue share model is unusual but franchisee-friendly: rather than a fixed royalty, the franchisee keeps a percentage of commissions earned across 100+ carriers. Low investment ($89K–$215K) relative to revenue potential makes this one of the best ROI opportunities in the portfolio. The 5.8-year payback period is exceptional. Requires sales aptitude and insurance licensing — not a passive investment.

Key Strength:  Unit Economics + Item 19 Transparency — 25% margin disclosed, 5.8-year payback, $687K AUV on sub-$215K investment
View Full FOE Report →
Pirtek
8.08 / 10 STRONG STRONG BUY

A B2B hydraulic hose repair franchise with the highest average unit revenue in the portfolio at $1.84M. The niche category — industrial hydraulic maintenance — has virtually no direct competition and serves manufacturers, construction companies, and heavy equipment operators. The 2.1% attrition rate is exceptional and the 28-year franchising history demonstrates durability. The 4% royalty is below category average. Requires mechanical aptitude and comfort in an industrial environment, which limits the candidate pool but also limits competition for qualified buyers.

Key Strength:  AUV + Market Position — $1.84M AUV in category with no direct competition; lowest attrition in portfolio
View Full FOE Report →

BUY — Score 6.5–7.9

Paul Davis Restoration
7.65 / 10 ADEQUATE BUY

A 55-year-old property restoration franchise in a recession-resistant category — revenue comes from insurance claims, not consumer spending. Climate events are driving 9.2% category growth. Very high AUV at $2.84M but requires significant operational complexity and staff management. Strong insurance carrier relationships built over decades are a meaningful competitive moat that new entrants cannot easily replicate. The 55-year track record gives the FDD credibility that emerging brands cannot match.

Key Strength:  Category Resilience + AUV — insurance-driven revenue stream is recession-proof; $2.84M AUV
View Full FOE Report →
Two Maids
7.24 / 10 ADEQUATE BUY

A residential cleaning franchise with strong unit economics — $892K average revenue on a sub-$144K investment. The pay-for-performance model creates natural incentive alignment between cleaners and the franchise: cleaners earn more when customers rate them highly. PE-backed since 2021 with active growth trajectory. Category growth of 8.3% is one of the strongest in the portfolio. The low initial investment makes this one of the most accessible high-revenue opportunities in the demo.

Key Strength:  Revenue Potential vs Investment — $892K AUV on sub-$144K investment; fastest-growing category
View Full FOE Report →
Anytime Fitness
7.14 / 10 ADEQUATE BUY

The world’s largest 24/7 fitness franchise with over 2,300 US locations and 22 years of franchising history. Scores strongly for transparent Item 19 disclosure, fixed monthly royalty structure ($699/month), and low 3.68% franchisee attrition. The 14.8-year payback is long but fully supportable with disclosed data. A sound choice for qualified buyers seeking a lifestyle-compatible semi-absentee fitness franchise with brand recognition in their market.

Key Strength:  Brand + FDD Transparency — Item 19 present with $395K AUV; #1 brand in category
View Full FOE Report →

BUY WITH CAUTION — Score 5.0–6.4

Smoothie King
6.34 / 10 ADEQUATE BUY WITH CAUTION

A well-established food and beverage brand with 33 years of franchising history and strong brand recognition. The concern is unit economics — 9% profit margin on $524K average revenue against a high-end investment of $840K produces an 18.5-year payback. The wide investment range ($264K–$840K) adds risk. The brand has changed ownership multiple times including sale to Mideast investors in 2012. A strong brand in a growing category, but the financial case requires careful location selection and realistic expectations on returns.

Key Concern:  Payback Period vs Investment — 18.5-year payback at 9% margin; $840K high-end with wide range spread
View Full FOE Report →

NEEDS MORE INFO — Score 3.5–4.9

Radiant Waxing
4.68 / 10 NEEDS REVIEW NEEDS MORE INFO

An emerging beauty franchise in a growing category, but with material disclosure gaps. No Item 19 means a buyer cannot verify unit economics — the franchisor is asking up to $424K without providing the financial transparency to justify that investment. The franchisor’s financials are not audited. Only 7 years in franchising with limited track record. The category growth is real, but brand risk is high: an unknown brand in a crowded market, asking for significant capital without showing its work.

Key Concern:  No Item 19 + Limited Track Record — unaudited financials, 7 years franchising, no revenue transparency
View Full FOE Report →
Snap Fitness
4.24 / 10 NEEDS REVIEW NEEDS MORE INFO

A 24/7 fitness franchise that has struggled with system contraction — losing a net 180 units over three years. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure is the primary concern: without it, a buyer cannot independently verify unit economics. Franchisee reviews are mixed to negative, with multiple current operators seeking exit. The estimated 28.5-year payback period (third-party research, not FDD data) raises material viability questions. Compare with Anytime Fitness to see what the same category looks like with transparency.

Key Concern:  No Item 19 + System Contraction — −180 units over 3 years; no franchisor-verified revenue data
View Full FOE Report →
The Item 19 difference is the single most important finding in this portfolio. A franchisor that discloses financial performance is telling you: we are confident enough in our unit economics to let the data speak. A franchisor that does not is telling you something else entirely. Of the 8 franchises in this portfolio, 6 provide Item 19 — and every one of the high-scoring franchises does. Both franchises scoring below 5.0 have no Item 19. That is not a coincidence.

Compare Brightway (discloses) vs Radiant Waxing (does not) →   |   Compare Anytime Fitness (discloses) vs Snap Fitness (does not) →